The Backlash of Clarity: Right Division Isn’t the Problem — Confusion Is
When you begin to speak about rightly dividing the word of truth, especially among sincere, well-meaning Christians, you quickly realise that the resistance isn’t always doctrinal—it’s often emotional, relational, and deeply ingrained. You’re not just introducing a new way of studying scripture; you’re challenging years of tradition, cherished assumptions, and spiritual habits that feel sacred. And while the truth of rightly dividing is clear, scriptural, and liberating, the path to sharing it is rarely smooth.
You might start with something simple—perhaps pointing out that Paul was given a unique apostleship, that his gospel was not taught by the twelve, and that the mystery revealed to him was kept hidden from ages past. But even this gentle nudge can stir discomfort. “We follow Jesus,” someone might say, with a tone that suggests you’ve somehow veered off course. And you’ll feel the weight of that statement, because it’s not just theological—it’s personal. Many believers have built their entire spiritual lives around the earthly ministry of Christ, clinging to His words in red as the highest authority, unaware that He now speaks from heaven through the apostle He appointed for this age of grace.
The moment you begin to separate Israel’s promises from the Body’s calling, the tension deepens. You’ll hear, “We’re spiritual Israel,” or “God’s promises to Israel are ours too,” and you’ll realise that the lines have been blurred for so long that clarity feels like division. But it’s not division—it’s precision. It’s the kind of clarity that Paul himself urged when he said we must rightly divide the word of truth, not blend it into a theological smoothie that tastes sweet but lacks substance. Yet for many, the idea that the Church is not Israel feels like a betrayal of the Old Testament’s richness, a denial of continuity, a loss of identity.
