Does Dispensationalism Divide God?
Many critics of dispensational truth argue that it creates a dangerous division within the Godhead—portraying the Father as the source of law and judgment, and the Son as the bearer of grace and mercy. This objection often takes the form of five specific claims:
- That dispensationalism separates the Father and the Son, implying two different divine standards.
- That it introduces two laws—one from the Father, one from the Son—undermining the incarnation.
- That it makes Jesus a new lawgiver who softens or replaces the Father’s commands.
- That it turns the kingdom of God into a political system rather than a spiritual reality.
- That it revives the ancient heresy of Marcionism by dividing the Old and New Testament portrayals of God.
In the article below, we will examine each of these claims in light of Scripture and demonstrate that they arise from a misunderstanding of dispensational teaching. Far from dividing the Godhead, dispensational truth affirms the unity of Father, Son, and Spirit—each operating in perfect harmony across distinct stewardships. Let the Word rightly divided bring clarity.
Dispensationalism and the Unity of the Godhead: One Will, One Purpose
A common accusation against dispensational truth is that it separates the Father and the Son—portraying the Father as the source of law and judgment, and the Son as the agent of grace and mercy. This objection claims that dispensationalism teaches two different divine wills, or even two different standards of righteousness. But this is a misrepresentation. Dispensational truth does not divide the Godhead; it distinguishes the progressive revelation of God’s unified purpose across time. Scripture affirms that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are one in essence, one in purpose, and one in will—yet they have revealed that will in different ways across dispensations.
Let us examine the key misunderstandings and correct them with Scripture.
 
 














