⭐ See content on my other sites here

Showing posts with label scripture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label scripture. Show all posts

The age-old claim that Paul’s gospel of grace require baptism and works

The age-old claim that Paul’s gospel of grace require baptism and works

Many have stumbled over the age‑old claim that Paul’s gospel in Ephesians 2:8-9 is incomplete without baptism or the works James describes, as though the two must be blended together to secure salvation. This confusion arises because people fail to rightly divide the Word of truth, mixing Israel’s kingdom doctrine with the mystery revealed to Paul for the Body of Christ. When doctrines are merged, clarity is lost, and the simplicity of the gospel of grace is buried under ritual and performance. The following post sets the record straight by laying out Paul’s teaching in its proper dispensation, showing why we must rightly divide in order to fully grasp the clarity of Scripture and rest in the finished work of Christ.

Claim:

Paul never actually used the word “alone” in Ephesians 2:8-9, yet some argue the reformers inserted it to stress faith without works. Instead, Paul is said to emphasise redemption through baptism, describing it as burial with Christ and rising to new life in Him. James is then understood to qualify Paul’s words by teaching that while we are justified by grace, sanctification requires our response in doing God’s will, so that faith is ultimately justified by good works (James 2:14-26).

Correction:

Paul’s words in Ephesians 2:8-9 are plain and powerful: “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.” In this passage Paul makes no mention of baptism, nor does he tie salvation to any ritual or human effort. The emphasis is entirely on God’s grace and the believer’s faith, with works explicitly excluded. While Paul does not use the word “alone,” the Word’s phrasing makes it clear that salvation is by faith apart from works, so “faith alone” is already implied. To suggest otherwise misses the force of Paul’s argument, which is that salvation is a gift, not something earned or completed by human action.

When Paul speaks of baptism, he does so in a very different way than many assume. He teaches that believers are baptized by the Word into Christ, not by water into a ritual. “For by one Word are we all baptized into one body” (1 Corinthians 12:13). This is a divine operation, not a human ceremony, and it places the believer into Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection (Romans 6:3-4). Water baptism belonged to Israel’s kingdom program, where repentance and ritual were required for entrance into the kingdom (Acts 2:38). But in the dispensation of grace, Paul reveals the mystery that salvation comes through faith alone, and the baptism that matters is the Word’s work, not man’s.

Confusion often arises when James is brought alongside Paul, as though James were qualifying Paul’s gospel. Yet James himself states that he is writing to “the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad” (James 1:1). His epistle is kingdom doctrine, directed to Israel, where faith had to be demonstrated by works to enter the promised kingdom. Paul, however, reveals the mystery kept secret since the world began, that justification before God is “to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly” (Romans 4:5). James is not correcting Paul, nor is Paul incomplete without James. They are speaking to different audiences under different dispensations, and to mix them is to butcher Paul’s gospel of grace.

Finally, Paul is clear about the relationship between faith and works. Faith alone saves, because it is counted for righteousness apart from works (Romans 4:5). Works follow salvation as fruit, not as the root. Believers are “created in Christ Jesus unto good works” (Ephesians 2:10), but those works are the result of salvation, not the condition for it. To say that sanctification “justifies faith” is to reverse Paul’s order and confuse the gospel. Faith saves; works are evidence of salvation, not the means by which it is secured. In this dispensation, salvation rests entirely on Christ’s finished work, received by faith, and any attempt to add baptism or works as conditions is a corruption of Paul’s message.



The Armour of God: Exposing Misconceptions and Revealing the True Spiritual Practice of Ephesians 6

The Armour of God: Exposing Misconceptions and Revealing the True Spiritual Practice of Ephesians 6


The wrong interpretation of Ephesians 6

When approaching Paul’s teaching on the armour of God in Ephesians 6, many believers fall into serious misunderstanding by relying on imagination, ritual, or physical symbolism rather than rightly dividing the Word in its proper context. Instead of recognising the armour as spiritual realities in the new man and the renewed mind, they substitute practices that are unbiblical and misleading. Each of the following paragraphs will expose a particular form of misinformation and wrong practice, showing how these errors arise, why they are dangerous, and why they must be avoided if we are to walk in the truth of this passage.

Many believers approach Paul’s teaching on the armour of God in Ephesians 6 with imagination rather than sober study, and the result is a distortion that weakens rather than strengthens. One of the most common errors is to treat the armour as if it were literal clothing. People recite prayers in which they “put on the helmet” or “strap on the breastplate,” as though Paul were instructing them to dress in a soldier’s uniform. This ritual may feel comforting, but it empties the passage of its true meaning. The armour is not external garments but spiritual realities—truth, righteousness, faith, salvation, and the Word of God—applied in the renewed mind of the new man. To reduce it to costume-like prayers is to miss the point entirely.

Another widespread practice is the ritual of “pleading the blood” or “releasing angels.” Many believers imagine that they can summon angels to form protective barriers or command them to act on their behalf. Yet Scripture never instructs us to direct angels; they are ministering spirits sent forth by God, not subject to human command (Hebrews 1:14). Likewise, pleading the blood as a formula is nowhere taught in Ephesians 6. These imaginative additions come from tradition and charismatic excess, not from Paul’s doctrine, and they lead people away from the sufficiency of Christ’s finished work.

Why we pray differently under grace

Why we pray differently under grace

Prayer is not merely a request—it is a reflection of our doctrinal position. To understand why believers today are not instructed to ask for physical provision as Israel once did, we must rightly divide the Word of truth and examine the nature of God’s promises to each group.

Israel’s Covenant Basis for Physical Requests 

Under the law, Israel was given a conditional covenant. God promised tangible blessings—land, health, prosperity, protection—in exchange for obedience to His statutes (Deuteronomy 28:1-14). Their prayers were covenantal appeals: if they obeyed, they could expect physical provision. This was not presumption—it was promise.

“And it shall come to pass, if thou shalt hearken diligently… the LORD thy God will set thee on high above all nations of the earth” (Deuteronomy 28:1). “Blessed shalt thou be in the city, and blessed shalt thou be in the field” (Deuteronomy 28:3).

Their relationship with God was national, visible, and earthly. Their prayers reflected that. They asked for rain, healing, deliverance, and victory—because those were the terms of their covenant.

This is the foundation of kingdom prayer: covenant-based, earthly, and circumstantial.

Grace-Based Prayer: A Spiritual Position, Not a Physical Covenant

Why the Bible Only Contradicts When You Read It All as One Book

Why the Bible Only Contradicts When You Read It All as One Book

This post addresses an article in which the author ridicules the Bible, claiming it is riddled with contradictions and therefore cannot be divinely inspired. Their critique stems not from malice, but from a deep misunderstanding of Scripture’s structure, purpose, and context. By treating the Bible as a single, undivided document—where every verse is assumed to apply equally to every person in every age—they fall into the common trap of contextual blindness. Their article mocks dozens of verses, pairing them as supposed contradictions, and uses these mismatches to dismiss the Bible’s credibility.

What follows is a corrective reply: each quoted “contradiction” is examined and rightly divided according to God’s dispensational blueprint—between prophecy and mystery, law and grace, Israel and the Body of Christ. Once this division is recognised, the confusion dissolves, and Scripture is revealed not as a flawed book, but as a perfectly ordered revelation of God’s truth, harmony, and eternal purpose.

You’re Right—It Doesn’t Add Up. But That’s Because You’re Missing the Key.

You wrote:

“The thing that primarily killed my faith is that I read enough of The Bible to realize that it teemed with contradictions and thus couldn’t possibly have been divinely inspired…”

That’s honest. And it’s a common conclusion—especially among those who were taught to treat the Bible as one seamless document, where every verse applies equally to every person in every age. But that’s not how the Bible presents itself. And once you learn to rightly divide it, the contradictions vanish.

Let’s start with your first example:

Does Dispensationalism Divide God?

Does Dispensationalism Divide God?

Many critics of dispensational truth argue that it creates a dangerous division within the Godhead—portraying the Father as the source of law and judgment, and the Son as the bearer of grace and mercy. This objection often takes the form of five specific claims:

  • That dispensationalism separates the Father and the Son, implying two different divine standards.
  • That it introduces two laws—one from the Father, one from the Son—undermining the incarnation.
  • That it makes Jesus a new lawgiver who softens or replaces the Father’s commands.
  • That it turns the kingdom of God into a political system rather than a spiritual reality.
  • That it revives the ancient heresy of Marcionism by dividing the Old and New Testament portrayals of God.

In the article below, we will examine each of these claims in light of Scripture and demonstrate that they arise from a misunderstanding of dispensational teaching. Far from dividing the Godhead, dispensational truth affirms the unity of Father, Son, and Spirit—each operating in perfect harmony across distinct stewardships. Let the Word rightly divided bring clarity.

Dispensationalism and the Unity of the Godhead: One Will, One Purpose

A common accusation against dispensational truth is that it separates the Father and the Son—portraying the Father as the source of law and judgment, and the Son as the agent of grace and mercy. This objection claims that dispensationalism teaches two different divine wills, or even two different standards of righteousness. But this is a misrepresentation. Dispensational truth does not divide the Godhead; it distinguishes the progressive revelation of God’s unified purpose across time. Scripture affirms that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are one in essence, one in purpose, and one in will—yet they have revealed that will in different ways across dispensations.

Let us examine the key misunderstandings and correct them with Scripture.

Dispensational Clarity concerning the Unity of God

Many who oppose dispensational truth often raise concerns about the unity of God and the gospel, suggesting that dispensational teaching divides God's nature, fragments His message, and introduces conflicting standards of salvation. These objections typically centre around five key claims, as listed below—each aiming to discredit the legitimacy of rightly dividing the Word. 

In this post, we will examine these claims carefully and demonstrate, through Scripture alone, that these arguments are unfounded. Far from undermining unity, dispensational truth clarifies God's consistent character, His unfolding gospel, and His sovereign plan across time.

Claims concerning the Unity of God and the Gospel

  • Dispensationalism divides Scripture into eras that allegedly change God’s requirements, fracturing the unity of His nature and voice.
  • It implies God operates differently in different dispensations, altering His will, law, and gospel — contradicting His immutability (Mal. 3:6; Heb. 13:8).
  • It creates multiple gospels (kingdom, grace, everlasting), which undermines the singularity of salvation and violates Galatians 1:8.
  • It separates the teachings of Jesus from the Church, making His commands seem irrelevant to believers today.
  • It treats the gospel as a system of timelines rather than a revelation of one Person — Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, today, and forever.

Dispensational Clarity concerning the Unity of God

One of the most common objections to dispensational truth is the claim that it divides God, fragments His gospel, and undermines His eternal nature. Critics often assert that dispensationalism teaches multiple ways of salvation, conflicting divine standards, and a fractured view of Christ’s teachings. But these accusations stem from a misunderstanding of what dispensationalism actually affirms. Far from dividing God, dispensational truth rightly distinguishes His dealings with mankind across time, while preserving the unity of His character, His gospel, and His redemptive purpose.

Let us examine and correct five common misconceptions.

The Turning of the Ages: From Kingdom to Grace

The Turning of the Ages: From Kingdom to Grace


The Kingdom Still Offered (Acts 1-7)

The book of Acts opens with the risen Christ speaking to His apostles of the kingdom of God. Their question is simple, almost childlike in its hope: “Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?” (Acts 1:6). The expectation is alive, the promises of the prophets still ringing in their ears. When Peter stands to preach at Pentecost, he does not announce a new programme but calls Israel to repentance so that “the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord, and he shall send Jesus Christ” (Acts 3:19-20). The kingdom is still on offer, the prophetic hope still extended to the nation.

Yet the story takes a darker turn. In Acts 7, Stephen, full of the Holy Ghost, rehearses Israel’s long history of resisting God’s messengers. His words cut deep: “Ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye” (Acts 7:51). The leaders, enraged, drag him outside the city and stone him. This is more than the silencing of a preacher; it is the nation’s climactic rejection of the Messiah and His witness. With Stephen’s death, the prophetic appeal to Israel as a nation reaches its close. The kingdom offer is refused, and the stage is set for God to reveal something entirely new.

The Damascus Road: A New Apostle (Acts 9)

Into this moment of rejection and scattering steps the most unlikely figure. Saul of Tarsus, breathing out threatenings and slaughter, sets out for Damascus to crush the followers of Jesus. But on that road, heaven breaks in. A light shines, a voice speaks, and the persecutor falls to the ground. “Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?” (Acts 9:4). In that instant, the enemy of Christ becomes His chosen vessel.

Paul’s Apostleship: Our Authority, Our Doctrine, Our Growth

Paul’s Apostleship: Our Authority, Our Doctrine, Our Growth

In 1 Corinthians 9:1-2, Paul opens with a series of rhetorical questions that gently affirm his God-given role and the spiritual fruit of his labour among the Corinthians:

“Am I not an apostle? am I not free? have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord? are not ye my work in the Lord?”

Each question carries weight:

  • “Am I not an apostle?” – Paul was sent by Christ with divine authority and purpose. His apostleship was not self-appointed, nor conferred by men, but established by the risen Lord.
  • “Am I not free?” – He served voluntarily, not under compulsion or religious institution. His liberty in Christ allowed him to minister without earthly constraint.
  • “Have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord?” – This was a requirement for apostleship (Acts 1:21-22). Paul saw the risen Christ on the road to Damascus (Acts 9:3-6), confirming his divine commissioning.
  • “Are not ye my work in the Lord?” – The Corinthians themselves were living proof of his ministry. Their salvation and spiritual growth were the fruit of his labour in Christ.

He continues:

“If I be not an apostle unto others, yet doubtless I am to you: for the seal of mine apostleship are ye in the Lord.” (1 Corinthians 9:2)

Even if others questioned his apostleship, the Corinthians could not. They had personally benefited from his teaching, correction, and care. Their faith was the seal—the authenticating mark—of his apostleship. A seal confirms ownership, authority, and truth. Their transformation in Christ was the evidence that Paul was sent by God.

From Carnal to Spiritual (Part 5): Walking in the Spirit Daily

From Carnal to Spiritual (Part 5): Walking in the Spirit Daily

Before we continue, let’s take a moment to look back at where we’ve been. In Part 1, we saw the difference between the carnal mind and the spiritual mind. The carnal mind is natural to all of us—it’s how we think before we come to Christ, and it remains with us unless we renew it. In Part 2, we learned that renewal requires forsaking. We cannot hold on to old thoughts and expect new life. The Word of God must replace what we once believed. Then in Part 3, we were reminded that spiritual growth is a journey. It’s not about being perfect but about moving forward. Every step matters. And in Part 4, we saw that renewal is shaped by doctrine. The mind is not renewed by emotion or experience, but by truth—truth rightly divided and received with meekness.

Now we come to Part 5, and we begin to see how this renewed mind is lived out. It’s not just something we understand—it’s something we walk in. Paul writes, “If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.” (Galatians 5:25). This is not a once-off decision. It is a daily walk. It is a way of thinking, a way of responding, a way of living. The spiritual mind is not just for study—it is for life.

Charity from a Pure Heart: The End of the Commandment

Charity from a Pure Heart: The End of the Commandment

There is a clarity in Paul’s words to Timothy that settles the heart and sharpens the focus: “Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned” (1 Timothy 1:5, KJV). This is not a peripheral truth—it is the very purpose of divine instruction. When all is said and done, when doctrine has been taught and principles laid down, this is what God desires: love that flows from purity, integrity, and genuine faith.

Charity, in its biblical sense, is not merely kindness or sentiment. It is the expression of Christ’s life formed within the believer. It is the labour that emerges from a heart shaped by truth, a conscience kept clean, and a faith that is sincere and rooted in Scripture. This kind of love does not originate in the flesh, nor is it sustained by religious habit. It is cultivated through the work of faith—the ongoing process of studying the Word of God, submitting to its authority, and yielding to its correction.

A pure heart is not assumed; it is examined. Before any action, before any judgement, the heart must be searched. Bitterness, envy, strife, and malice must be identified and removed. The believer must ensure that love is the sole motive—unmixed, unforced, and unpretentious. When the heart is pure, the conscience clear, and the faith genuine, the believer is equipped to approve things that are excellent and to walk in the charity that fulfils the commandment.

From Expectation to Dispensation: Peter’s Prophetic Shift


From Expectation to Dispensation: Peter’s Prophetic Shift

There’s a subtle but powerful dispensational insight in the way Peter’s letters frame the coming of the Lord. At first glance, 1 Peter and 2 Peter might seem like spiritual bookends—both speaking to suffering saints with hope—but a closer look reveals something far deeper: a prophetic shift, one that traces the unfolding of God’s plan from Kingdom expectation to grace dispensation.

“But the end of all things is at hand: be ye therefore sober, and watch unto prayer.” —1 Peter 4:7 (KJV)

In 1 Peter, written during a time when the offer of the Kingdom was still fresh in Israel’s memory, Peter urged the Kingdom believers to live with urgency. His words echo the question posed in Acts 1:6, “Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?” The apostles anticipated the imminent return of Christ in glory—to reign as King and fulfill the promises of Israel’s restoration. But Jesus answered, “It is not for you to know the times or the seasons…” (Acts 1:7)—a subtle indication that something else was about to unfold.

As Israel’s national rejection of their Messiah deepened, that Kingdom expectation was deferred. Not abandoned—but postponed. And in that divine pause, God revealed the mystery kept secret since the world began: the dispensation of the grace of God, entrusted to Paul for the Gentiles (Ephesians 3:1-6). A new heavenly calling emerged—the Body of Christ—not born of Law, lineage, or national covenant, but by faith alone, through grace alone.

Fast forward to 2 Peter, and the tone shifts.

Is Jesus the Messiah? A Look at the Hebrew Scriptures


Is Jesus the Messiah? A Look at the Hebrew Scriptures

For centuries, the Jewish people have awaited the arrival of the Messiah—the anointed one who will bring redemption and establish God’s kingdom. But what if the Messiah has already come? What if the very scriptures of the Tanakh (Jewish Bible) reveal His identity?

The apostle Paul, a devout Jew trained in the Torah, wrote extensively about the Messiah in his letter to the Romans. But his arguments were not based on new teachings; rather, they were deeply rooted in the Hebrew Scriptures. Let’s explore how Paul’s writings align with the prophecies of the Tanakh.

1. The Messiah Must Be from the Line of David

Paul states in Romans 1:3 that the Messiah was “made of the seed of David according to the flesh.” This is a direct reference to the Jewish expectation that the Messiah would come from David’s lineage.

  • 2 Samuel 7:12-16 – God promises David that his throne will be established forever.
  • Jeremiah 23:5-6 – The Messiah is called the “righteous Branch” from David’s line.
  • Micah 5:2 – The ruler of Israel will come from Bethlehem, David’s hometown.

Jesus was born in Bethlehem and traced His lineage directly to David, fulfilling this requirement.

The dispensation of God which is given to me for you



The dispensation of God which is given to me for you


The Mystery Revealed

"Whereof I am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to fulfil the word of God; Even the mystery which hath been hid from ages and from generations, but now is made manifest to his saints." (Colossians 1:25-26, KJV)

Throughout the ages, God has worked through distinct dispensations, each revealing His purpose at its appointed time. The passage above highlights an incredible truth—Paul was entrusted with a unique dispensation, one that had never before been revealed. It was a mystery, hidden from generations past, but now made manifest.

This means that the gospel and doctrine given to Paul were not simply a continuation of what had come before. They were not an extension of the kingdom promises given to Israel, nor were they a repackaging of the message preached by the twelve apostles. Paul received something entirely new—a gospel of grace that was distinct from Israel’s prophetic program.

A Brand-New Gospel and Doctrine

Many today fail to recognise the vital distinction between the earthly ministry of Jesus to Israel and the heavenly revelation of Christ to Paul. Jesus’ earthly ministry was directed to the Jews:

"I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." (Matthew 15:24, KJV)

Honouring Scripture Over Emotion: Learning from Paul’s Example


Honouring Scripture Over Emotion: Learning from Paul’s Example

In moments of provocation, how do we respond? Do we let our emotions dictate our actions, or do we submit ourselves to the authority of God's Word? Paul’s encounter with the high priest in Acts 23:2-5 offers a powerful example of humility, self-control, and unwavering reverence for Scripture—an attitude we should value and imitate.

Paul’s Immediate Reaction

When struck unjustly, Paul’s first response was sharp: “God shall smite thee, thou whited wall” (Acts 23:3). His words carried righteous indignation, exposing the hypocrisy of Ananias, who violated the law he claimed to uphold. Yet, when informed that he had spoken against the high priest, Paul did not defend his initial reaction or justify his anger. Instead, he immediately submitted to the truth of Scripture, quoting Exodus 22:28: “Thou shalt not revile the gods, nor curse the ruler of thy people.”

This swift correction is remarkable. Paul could have clung to his frustration, arguing that Ananias was corrupt and undeserving of honour. But he did not. His commitment to God’s Word outweighed his personal feelings, reminding us that Scripture, not emotion, must govern our responses.

What Lessons Can We Learn From This

What Does It Mean to 'Not Be Under the Law?'


What Does It Mean to 'Not Be Under the Law?'

Paul’s teaching that believers are “not under the law, but under grace” (Romans 6:14) has often been misunderstood, sometimes leading people to believe they have no moral obligations or restrictions whatsoever. But the reality is far richer. To truly grasp this concept, we must explore four key aspects: freedom from the Mosaic Law as a means of justification, walking in the Spirit through the Word of God, avoiding legalism and condemnation, and understanding the common misconceptions about the law.

Righteousness by faith, not by law

First, being free from the law means grace believers are no longer required to follow the Mosaic Law to attain righteousness. Paul explains this beautifully in Galatians 3:24-25: “Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.” Before Christ, the law served as a guide, teaching people about sin and their need for salvation. Its purpose was not to save, but to point them to Christ. However, now that Christ has come, believers now live under grace through faith in Him, not under a rigid law system for righteousness. Romans 6:14 clearly states: “For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.” This doesn’t mean that sin is now acceptable, but rather that righteousness is a result of faith, not legal adherence. Through His death and resurrection, Christ fulfilled the law so that believers could be declared righteous through His finished work, not through personal effort.

May God Have Mercy on Your Soul: An Expression of Ignorance


May God Have Mercy on Your Soul: An Expression of Ignorance

As I watched a funeral on TV, I heard the minister say the following, "Rest in peace <person's name>, may God have mercy on your soul." Those words stuck with me and the more I thought about them, the more I was struck by the absolute ignorance embedded in this statement—an ignorance that disregards the foundational truth of the gospel and the finished work of the cross of Christ. It revealed how tradition and empty expressions continue to be spoken without thought, maintaining a cycle of religious negligence rather than biblical accuracy. This phrase, like others that I list at the end of the post**, have become a customary utterance, mindlessly repeated without questioning its meaning or validity in light of God’s revealed truth. Seeing this, I felt it necessary to bring attention to not only this statement but others also, that persist as vain customs, promoting human imagination rather than biblical reality. Words carry weight, and when they contradict the truth of Scripture, they must be identified and dismissed as meaningless rhetoric—mere traditions of men that veil the absolute authority of God’s Word. 

This article serves as a call to recognize such errors and return to the certainty of sound doctrine, particularly the gospel of God's grace as taught in Paul’s epistles.

The Hollow Tradition of a Fruitless Expression

"May God have mercy on your soul."

Exposing the Wiles of the Devil: How Satan Twisted Scripture Then and Now



Exposing the Wiles of the Devil: How Satan Twisted Scripture Then and Now

Throughout history, Satan has persistently sought to distort God's truth and lead humanity astray. His strategies, from the temptations he presented to Jesus in the wilderness to today's tactics that sow confusion and false doctrine, remain as cunning as ever. By understanding these methods, we can better guard against deception and remain steadfast in the truth revealed in Scripture.

Satan’s cunning is notably evident in his temptation of Jesus in the wilderness, as described in Matthew 4. By selectively quoting and twisting Scripture, he attempted to manipulate Jesus into sinning or misusing His divine authority. These events not only provide insight into Satan’s strategies during Jesus' time but also shed light on how his deceptive tactics continue to lead people into darkness today.

People's imaginations concerning 'receiving the Holy Spirit' (Example #3)


People's imaginations concerning 'receiving the Holy Spirit' (Example #3)

This post is written for the sole purpose of illustrating the ignorance of sound doctrine on social media these days. My aim is to emphasize the absolute necessity of studying the Bible for oneself and seeking answers from the source instead of relying on imaginations or opinions given by people, who may be sincere, but are as ignorant as the one who asked the question to start with. 

So, let's begin by stating the question that was asked in the beginning of a social media thread,


QUESTION: "How can Christians catch the Spirit?"

Below is the third of a few answers that were supplied to this question on social media. They appear to be sincere but are unfortunately completely false or have parts that are from the imaginations of men who have not sought out the truth in the Word of God. After this 'answer', and a few more that I will write about later, I add comments as to why the answer is wrong and what the Word of God actually says about it.


False Imagination #3

To catch the Spirit we need to know what are the commandments that Jesus gave? They are in Matthew 5:3–16 plus the two greatest commandments (Matthew 22:36–40). Strive to master all of the provisions in the Sermon on the Mount because as you do you will draw closer to God and feel His Spirit more abundantly in your life.

My comments:

People's imaginations concerning 'receiving the Holy Spirit' (Example #2)


People's imaginations concerning 'receiving the Holy Spirit' (Example #2)

This post is written for the sole purpose of illustrating the ignorance of sound doctrine on social media these days. My aim is to emphasize the absolute necessity of studying the Bible for oneself and seeking answers from the source instead of relying on imaginations or opinions given by people, who may be sincere, but are as ignorant as the one who asked the question to start with. 

So, let's begin by stating the question that was asked in the beginning of the thread,


QUESTION: "How can Christians catch the Spirit?"


Below is the second of a few answers that were supplied to this question on social media. They appear to be sincere but are unfortunately completely false or have parts that are from the imaginations of men who have not sought out the truth in the Word of God. After this 'answer', and a few more that I will write about later, I add comments as to why the answer is wrong and what the Word of God actually says about it.


False Imagination #2

You will get the Holy Spirit if and when God Almighty chooses to grant it to you. The fact is most do NOT receive the grant of Holy Spirit, but that is NOT a bad thing.

Born again (baptized/anointed) by Holy Spirit is reserved for just a very few here on earth. This anointing or appointing only is for those who have been selected from among humans by God Almighty HIMSELF to serve in heaven as kings and priest alongside Jesus Christ. They receive a gift of Holy Spirit that assures them that they are HIS adopted children. The number of these is exactly 144,000, no more, no less.


My comments:

People's imaginations concerning 'receiving the Holy Spirit' (Example #1)



People's imaginations concerning 'receiving the Holy Spirit' (Example #1)

This post is written for the sole purpose of illustrating the ignorance of sound doctrine on social media these days. My aim is to emphasize the absolute necessity of studying the Bible for oneself and seeking answers from the source instead of relying on imaginations or opinions given by people, who may be sincere, but are as ignorant as the one who asked the question to start with. 

So, let's begin by stating the question that was asked in the beginning of the thread,


QUESTION: "How can Christians catch the Spirit?"


Below is the first of a few answers that were supplied to this question on social media. They appear to be sincere but are unfortunately completely false or have parts that are from the imaginations of men who have not sought out the truth in the Word of God. After this 'answer', and a few more that I will write about later, I add comments as to why the answer is wrong and what the Word of God actually says about it.

False Imagination #1

If you are a Christian and accept Christ, the Holy Spirit/Holy Ghost is in you. To activate it, you need to do one very important thing: Let the Holy Spirit decide certain life decisions for you. To tell if the Holy Spirit is speaking to you, you will feel some things feel “right”, or some things feel “wrong”. Society sometimes calls it a “gut instinct”. However, in this case, you will feel in your intuition that some things are what God wants you to do, while some just feel off.

My comments: