Why we pray differently under grace

Why we pray differently under grace

Prayer is not merely a request—it is a reflection of our doctrinal position. To understand why believers today are not instructed to ask for physical provision as Israel once did, we must rightly divide the Word of truth and examine the nature of God’s promises to each group.

Israel’s Covenant Basis for Physical Requests 

Under the law, Israel was given a conditional covenant. God promised tangible blessings—land, health, prosperity, protection—in exchange for obedience to His statutes (Deuteronomy 28:1-14). Their prayers were covenantal appeals: if they obeyed, they could expect physical provision. This was not presumption—it was promise.

“And it shall come to pass, if thou shalt hearken diligently… the LORD thy God will set thee on high above all nations of the earth” (Deuteronomy 28:1). “Blessed shalt thou be in the city, and blessed shalt thou be in the field” (Deuteronomy 28:3).

Their relationship with God was national, visible, and earthly. Their prayers reflected that. They asked for rain, healing, deliverance, and victory—because those were the terms of their covenant.

This is the foundation of kingdom prayer: covenant-based, earthly, and circumstantial.

Grace-Based Prayer: A Spiritual Position, Not a Physical Covenant

Honouring Scripture Over Emotion: Learning from Paul’s Example

Honouring Scripture Over Emotion: Learning from Paul’s Example

In moments of provocation, how do we respond? Do we let our emotions dictate our actions, or do we submit ourselves to the authority of God's Word? Paul’s encounter with the high priest in Acts 23:2-5 offers a powerful example of humility, self-control, and unwavering reverence for Scripture—an attitude we should value and imitate.

Paul’s Immediate Reaction

When struck unjustly, Paul’s first response was sharp: “God shall smite thee, thou whited wall” (Acts 23:3). His words carried righteous indignation, exposing the hypocrisy of Ananias, who violated the law he claimed to uphold. Yet, when informed that he had spoken against the high priest, Paul did not defend his initial reaction or justify his anger. Instead, he immediately submitted to the truth of Scripture, quoting Exodus 22:28: “Thou shalt not revile the gods, nor curse the ruler of thy people.”

This swift correction is remarkable. Paul could have clung to his frustration, arguing that Ananias was corrupt and undeserving of honour. But he did not. His commitment to God’s Word outweighed his personal feelings, reminding us that Scripture, not emotion, must govern our responses.

What Lessons Can We Learn From This