How Grace Transforms Faith in Daily Life

How Grace Transforms Faith in Daily Life

Understanding the Foundation of Grace

Faith can only be understood correctly when it is placed upon the foundation of grace, because in this present dispensation God is not relating to humanity through the demands of the law or the measurement of human performance, but through the completed work of Christ. Grace is God’s initiative, His provision, and His finished accomplishment on behalf of the believer. It is the divine groundwork laid before any human response is possible. Scripture affirms this clearly when it says, “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God” (Ephesians 2:8). Grace provides the gift long before faith reaches out to receive it, and this order is essential for understanding how the believer stands, grows, and operates in the Christian life.

Defining Faith as a Response to Truth

Faith, in its biblical sense, is not a force generated by human willpower nor a feeling that fluctuates with emotion. It is the settled persuasion that what God has spoken is true simply because God has spoken it. Scripture teaches that “faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God” (Romans 10:17), showing that faith is born from truth, shaped by truth, and strengthened by truth. Under grace, faith does not attempt to convince God to act, nor does it strive to earn what God has already provided. Instead, faith responds to the truth of what Christ has accomplished, trusting that His finished work is sufficient and complete.

Contrasting Law and Grace to Clarify Faith’s Role

Why Believers Doubt: Assurance, Grace, and the Authority of Paul’s Doctrine

Why Believers Doubt: Assurance, Grace, and the Authority of Paul’s Doctrine

Doubt is one of the most common struggles among sincere believers, and it often appears precisely in those who genuinely trust Christ. When someone says, “I believe Him to be the Lord and Savior of my soul, yet I still doubt my salvation,” the issue is never the finished work of Christ—it is always the battle between the renewed spirit and the unrenewed mind. Under grace, salvation is not measured by feelings, sensations, or visible signs. Paul teaches that we are saved by believing the gospel of Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection (1 Cor 15:1-4), and he never ties assurance to emotional experiences or physical manifestations. Instead, he anchors it entirely in the objective truth of Christ’s finished work. Doubt does not mean a person is unsaved; it simply reveals that the flesh is still active (Gal 5:17) and the mind still needs renewal (Rom 12:2).

Many believers assume that the absence of dramatic transformation means nothing has happened. But Paul teaches that the moment we believe, God performs a spiritual operation that is invisible to the senses: we are sealed with the Holy Spirit (Eph 1:13), justified by faith (Rom 5:1), forgiven of all trespasses (Col 2:13), and made complete in Christ (Col 2:10). None of these realities produce physical sensations. The transformation the Holy Spirit works in us is internal and progressive, not outward or instant. The flesh remains unchanged (Rom 7:18), which is why a believer may “feel the same” even though everything has changed spiritually. Growth comes through doctrine, not emotion; through renewing the mind (Rom 12:2), not through waiting for signs; through walking in the Spirit (Gal 5:16), not through outward measures.

Another source of doubt comes from religious accusation. When the enemy whispers that wearing jewelry or certain fashion items makes your salvation false, he is not speaking from Scripture—he is speaking from legalism. Paul never connects salvation to outward appearance, clothing, or personal style. In fact, he warns the Body of Christ not to let anyone judge them in outward things or impose commandments that appear spiritual but have no value (Col 2:16-23). The devil loves to use rules, standards, and external measurements to undermine assurance, because he knows that a believer who doubts their standing in Christ becomes unstable and fearful. But grace teaches that salvation is rooted in Christ alone (Eph 2:8-9), not in behavior, appearance, or performance.

It is also essential to understand why we follow Paul’s doctrine when dealing with assurance and spiritual growth. Paul explicitly states that he is the apostle of the Gentiles (Rom 11:13), and the Lord Jesus Christ Himself commands believers today to recognize Paul’s writings as His authoritative instructions for this dispensation (1 Cor 14:37). This means that the doctrine of salvation, assurance, identity, and Christian living for the Body of Christ is found in Paul’s epistles—Romans through Philemon. When we ground our understanding in the doctrine Christ gave to Paul, confusion fades and assurance becomes stable.

The path forward is not to chase feelings or wait for visible change. It is to anchor assurance in the gospel (1 Cor 15:1-4), renew the mind with Pauline truth (Eph 4:23), and reject every form of legalistic condemnation (Rom 8:1). The believer must learn to distinguish between the voice of truth and the voice of accusation. Truth says you are complete in Christ (Col 2:10), sealed by the Spirit (Eph 1:13), and accepted in the Beloved (Eph 1:6). Accusation says you must prove, maintain, or validate your salvation through outward things. The more the mind is filled with sound doctrine (2 Tim 2:7; 2 Tim 3:16), the quieter the doubts become. Assurance grows not from looking at yourself but from looking at Christ and resting in what He has already accomplished.

Who decides what is morally right—God or people

Who decides what is morally right—God or people?

QUESTION:

Who decides what is morally right—God or people (like: Thomas Aquinas)—and why do Christians sometimes disagree about what is moral, especially when reading passages like Judges 11?

ANSWER:

When people ask whether morality is defined by man or by God, they often assume that morality is a universal system that applies the same way in every age, covenant, and dispensation. But Scripture shows something far more precise. God Himself defines what is right, but He does so within the framework of His revealed will for each people and each program. What was moral for Israel under the law is not the same as what governs the Body of Christ under grace. This is why trying to force all morality into one timeless category leads to confusion, disagreement, and contradictions.

The word “moral” simply refers to what is right or wrong according to a standard. The real question is not what the word means, but whose standard applies. Thomas Aquinas and other theologians tried to build universal systems of morality by blending philosophy with Scripture, but the Bible never asks Christians to follow man‑made categories or philosophical ethics. God revealed His will to Israel through the law, and He reveals His will to the Body of Christ through grace. Both come from Him, but they are not the same system, and they are not given to the same people.

How Can You Be Justified with God?

How Can You Be Justified with God?

There is a question that rises above every other question you will ever ask in this brief and fragile life, a question that stands like a mountain above the plains of human curiosity, refusing to be ignored or postponed, because it reaches beyond the boundaries of time and presses into eternity itself. That question is simply this: How can you be justified with God? You may spend your days wondering where you came from, what your purpose is, how the universe works, or what lies beyond the veil of death, but all these inquiries, however noble or fascinating, eventually bend toward this one unavoidable point. If you cannot stand righteous before a holy God, then every other discovery, achievement, or insight becomes nothing more than a temporary distraction from an eternal problem. Job asked it plainly: “How should man be just with God?” (Job 9:2). Bildad echoed it: “How then can man be justified with God?” (Job 25:4). And whether you realize it or not, your own soul whispers the same question in the quiet hours when the noise of life fades and the weight of eternity presses in.

Yet the tragedy—and the irony—is that although this question is the greatest question ever placed before the human heart, you are utterly incapable of answering it by your own intellect, your own religion, or your own tradition. You may pride yourself on your intelligence, your education, your ability to reason and analyze and debate, but the moment you attempt to climb the heights of God’s righteousness with the ladder of your own understanding, you discover that your ladder is far too short, your footing far too weak, and your vision far too dim. God confronted Job with this reality when He asked, “Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth?” (Job 38:4), reminding him—and reminding you—that the human mind, however brilliant, cannot reach into the counsels of God or grasp the depths of His righteousness. You may understand the mechanics of the world around you, but you cannot, by intellect alone, understand the holiness of the God who made it.

Just and the Justifier: How God Solved the Impossible

JUST AND THE JUSTIFIER: HOW GOD SOLVED THE IMPOSSIBLE

There are moments in Scripture where God forces me to stop, breathe, and face reality without the comfort of excuses or the illusion of self‑importance. Romans 1–3 is one of those moments. It is not a gentle introduction to the Christian life; it is a courtroom, a spotlight, and a mirror. It is God taking me by the shoulders and saying, “Look at Me. Look at yourself. Now tell Me how you plan to reconcile the two.” And this is where the true dilemma begins.

THE DILEMMA I CANNOT ESCAPE

God is righteous. I am guilty. I cannot soften either side of that equation. God’s righteousness is not flexible, adjustable, or sentimental. It is absolute. It is the blazing, unchanging standard of His own nature (Deut.32:4). He cannot deny Himself (2 Tim.2:13). He cannot lower His bar. He cannot call evil good or good evil (Isa.5:20). He cannot overlook sin, excuse sin, or pretend sin is something less than what it is.

And then there is me. Not the polished version of me. Not the church‑friendly version of me. Not the version I present to others. The real me — the one God sees (Heb.4:13). Romans 3 does not allow me to hide behind the façade of “I’m not that bad.” It strips me bare and leaves me standing in the full light of divine truth: There is none righteous (Rom.3:10). There is none that doeth good (Rom.3:12). Every mouth is stopped (Rom.3:19). All the world is guilty before God (Rom.3:19).

The Shocking Price of Sin: Adam’s Lesson, Our Reality

This post and its message were inspired by a precious and beloved brother of mine who regularly preaches Christ on the street corners. One of his YouTube videos was the inspiration for this topic and the probable series of posts to come that trace blood, sacrifice, and atonement through Scripture.

Thank you for your faithfulness, Brother Lloyd. 🙏

The Shocking Price of Sin: Adam’s Lesson, Our Reality

Adam was created in perfection. He only knew life. Proof of this is the fact that he named his wife Eve because she was the mother of all living (Genesis 3:20). Death was not part of his world. But when sin entered, everything changed. Shame exposed their nakedness, and fig leaves—human effort—could not cover it.

Genesis 3:21 records: “Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins, and clothed them.” This was no small act. For the first time, Adam saw death. An innocent animal was slain. Blood was shed. Life was taken so that his guilt could be covered. Imagine the shock, the horror, the weight of guilt pressing down as Adam realized: my sin caused this death.

The fig leaves they had sewn together represented man’s attempt to atone for sin by his own effort. But God rejected this. Nothing we do can cover guilt. Only blood, determined by God, can atone. This was not arbitrary—it was prophetic. It pointed forward to Christ, the Lamb of God, whose blood alone would bring true atonement. From the very beginning, God was teaching that forgiveness is not earned by human effort but provided through His appointed sacrifice.

Be ye not unequally yoked

Be ye not unequally yoked

When Paul writes in 2 Corinthians 6:14, “Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers,” he uses an image drawn from farming. Two animals yoked together must be of the same kind and strength, or the work will be hindered. Spiritually, the lesson is that believers must not bind themselves in partnerships, alliances, or commitments that compromise their faith or obedience to Christ. The yoke speaks of shared direction and shared burden, and if one is walking in truth while the other is walking in darkness, the result is conflict and compromise.

It is important to see that this command does not mean believers must cut off all contact with unbelievers. Paul himself clarifies in 1 Corinthians 5:9-10 that to avoid unbelievers entirely would mean leaving the world altogether. The issue is not ordinary relationships but binding partnerships that demand shared spiritual commitments. When a believer enters into marriage, business, or ministry alliances with those who reject the truth, he is unequally yoked, and his walk with Christ is endangered. The warning is against compromise, not against contact.

This distinction is also applicable when considering family and friends who are unbelievers. Having unbelieving family members or friends is not a violation of this verse. In fact, Scripture calls us to love them, live peaceably with them, and be a witness of the gospel in their presence (Romans 12:18; 1 Corinthians 7:12-16). These relationships are part of the believer’s testimony in the world. They are not “yokes” in the biblical sense unless they demand shared spiritual commitments that pull the believer away from Christ. We are called to be salt and light, not to isolate ourselves from those who need the gospel.

The question also extends to those who profess Christianity but trust in a false gospel, particularly a gospel of works. Galatians 1:6-9 makes clear that trusting in works for salvation is “another gospel” and not saving faith at all. Though such individuals may claim the name of Christ, they are not resting in His finished work, and therefore they remain “unbelievers” in the sense Paul describes in 2 Corinthians 6:14. This means that believers must exercise caution. Outreach to them is right and necessary, but spiritual fellowship or ministry partnership that affirms their error is forbidden. To join hands in ministry with those who preach another gospel is to compromise the truth.

The balance, then, is clear. Believers are called to separate from partnerships that compromise truth, but they are also called to remain present in relationships where God has placed them, bearing witness to the gospel. We are not commanded to isolation, but to faithful testimony. The principle of being “not unequally yoked” is about guarding the purity of our walk and our witness, while still living in the world as ambassadors for Christ. Separation from error and compromise must be firm, but love and presence among unbelievers must remain, so that the light of the gospel shines clearly.

--------------
Thank you, Dennis, for an excellent question.

The age-old claim that Paul’s gospel of grace require baptism and works

The age-old claim that Paul’s gospel of grace require baptism and works

Many have stumbled over the age‑old claim that Paul’s gospel in Ephesians 2:8-9 is incomplete without baptism or the works James describes, as though the two must be blended together to secure salvation. This confusion arises because people fail to rightly divide the Word of truth, mixing Israel’s kingdom doctrine with the mystery revealed to Paul for the Body of Christ. When doctrines are merged, clarity is lost, and the simplicity of the gospel of grace is buried under ritual and performance. The following post sets the record straight by laying out Paul’s teaching in its proper dispensation, showing why we must rightly divide in order to fully grasp the clarity of Scripture and rest in the finished work of Christ.

Claim:

Paul never actually used the word “alone” in Ephesians 2:8-9, yet some argue the reformers inserted it to stress faith without works. Instead, Paul is said to emphasise redemption through baptism, describing it as burial with Christ and rising to new life in Him. James is then understood to qualify Paul’s words by teaching that while we are justified by grace, sanctification requires our response in doing God’s will, so that faith is ultimately justified by good works (James 2:14-26).

Correction:

From Shadows to Substance: Paul’s Mystery Doctrine and the Sabbath

QUESTION:

As a Christian who follows the Messiah rather than the traditions of Christianity, what day did and does the Messiah — our example — continue to esteem (Greek: κρίνω, to judge, to decide, to determine) as the Sabbath (Hebrews 13:8)?

ANSWER:

When we look at the life of the Messiah in the days of His earthly ministry, we see that He honoured the Sabbath as it was given by God from the beginning. Luke 4:16 says that it was His custom to go into the synagogue on the Sabbath day. This was right in the context of Israel under the Law, for Jesus was “made under the law” (Galatians 4:4) and lived as a Jew among Jews. He did not set aside the Sabbath, but He corrected the false traditions that men had added, showing that it was lawful to do good on the Sabbath (Matthew 12:12). In that time, the seventh day was rightly esteemed, because the Law was still in effect for Israel.

But when we rightly divide the Word of truth (2 Timothy 2:15), we see that the Sabbath, along with feast days, ordinances, and observances, does not apply to the body of Christ today. Paul makes this clear in Colossians 2:16–17: “Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.” These things were shadows, pointing forward, but now the reality is Christ Himself. Under grace, they are of no effect, because our standing before God is not in ordinances but in the finished work of Christ.

Paul’s doctrine, the mystery revealed to him, is what governs the body of Christ today. He was given the dispensation of the grace of God (Ephesians 3:2–3), and his epistles are our curriculum, our spiritual doctrine. God’s will in this dispensation is simple and clear: “Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth” (1 Timothy 2:4). That truth is found in Paul’s gospel, the preaching of Jesus Christ according to the revelation of the mystery (Romans 16:25). This is what matters for us today, not the observances of the Law given to Israel.

In summary, Jesus esteemed the Sabbath in His earthly ministry because He lived under the Law as a Jew. But for the body of Christ, the Sabbath and all ordinances are no longer binding. Paul teaches that these things are shadows, and in grace they have no effect. Our focus is on the mystery doctrine revealed to Paul, which is God’s will for us today: salvation and the knowledge of the truth through the gospel of Christ.

The Armour of God: Exposing Misconceptions and Revealing the True Spiritual Practice of Ephesians 6

The Armour of God: Exposing Misconceptions and Revealing the True Spiritual Practice of Ephesians 6

The wrong interpretation of Ephesians 6

When approaching Paul’s teaching on the armour of God in Ephesians 6, many believers fall into serious misunderstanding by relying on imagination, ritual, or physical symbolism rather than rightly dividing the Word in its proper context. Instead of recognising the armour as spiritual realities in the new man and the renewed mind, they substitute practices that are unbiblical and misleading. Each of the following paragraphs will expose a particular form of misinformation and wrong practice, showing how these errors arise, why they are dangerous, and why they must be avoided if we are to walk in the truth of this passage.

Many believers approach Paul’s teaching on the armour of God in Ephesians 6 with imagination rather than sober study, and the result is a distortion that weakens rather than strengthens. One of the most common errors is to treat the armour as if it were literal clothing. People recite prayers in which they “put on the helmet” or “strap on the breastplate,” as though Paul were instructing them to dress in a soldier’s uniform. This ritual may feel comforting, but it empties the passage of its true meaning. The armour is not external garments but spiritual realities—truth, righteousness, faith, salvation, and the Word of God—applied in the renewed mind of the new man. To reduce it to costume-like prayers is to miss the point entirely.

Another widespread practice is the ritual of “pleading the blood” or “releasing angels.” Many believers imagine that they can summon angels to form protective barriers or command them to act on their behalf. Yet Scripture never instructs us to direct angels; they are ministering spirits sent forth by God, not subject to human command (Hebrews 1:14). Likewise, pleading the blood as a formula is nowhere taught in Ephesians 6. These imaginative additions come from tradition and charismatic excess, not from Paul’s doctrine, and they lead people away from the sufficiency of Christ’s finished work.

To the Saints Who Visit Here—A Thank You

To the Saints Who Visit Here—A Thank You

To each one who has visited this site—thank you. Your presence here is not taken lightly. Whether you came seeking clarity, encouragement, or simply exploring, I’m grateful for the opportunity to walk a few steps with you in the Word. My prayer is that your visits have stirred not only curiosity, but conviction—that you are growing in sound doctrine and in the understanding of God’s Word rightly divided.

But more than doctrinal clarity, I long for you to know Christ.

Not merely as a name in Scripture, but as the living, risen Saviour who gave Himself for you. Without Him, we are eternally separated from God, from life, from peace, and from glory. But because of Him—because of His sacrifice—we can be justified, reconciled, and restored to fellowship with the God who made us.

Jesus Christ is the Son of God, yes—but He is also the express image of God, the fullness of the Godhead bodily. It was not merely a representative who died for us—it was God Himself, incarnate, who bore our sin and paid our debt. What love is this, that the Creator would become the sacrifice? That the Judge would take the penalty? That the Holy One would make Himself the offering?

This is salvation. And it is offered freely to all who believe.

But salvation is not the end—it is the beginning.

Why the Bible Only Contradicts When You Read It All as One Book

Why the Bible Only Contradicts When You Read It All as One Book

This post addresses an article in which the author ridicules the Bible, claiming it is riddled with contradictions and therefore cannot be divinely inspired. Their critique stems not from malice, but from a deep misunderstanding of Scripture’s structure, purpose, and context. By treating the Bible as a single, undivided document—where every verse is assumed to apply equally to every person in every age—they fall into the common trap of contextual blindness. Their article mocks dozens of verses, pairing them as supposed contradictions, and uses these mismatches to dismiss the Bible’s credibility.

What follows is a corrective reply: each quoted “contradiction” is examined and rightly divided according to God’s dispensational blueprint—between prophecy and mystery, law and grace, Israel and the Body of Christ. Once this division is recognised, the confusion dissolves, and Scripture is revealed not as a flawed book, but as a perfectly ordered revelation of God’s truth, harmony, and eternal purpose.

You’re Right—It Doesn’t Add Up. But That’s Because You’re Missing the Key.

You wrote:

“The thing that primarily killed my faith is that I read enough of The Bible to realize that it teemed with contradictions and thus couldn’t possibly have been divinely inspired…”

That’s honest. And it’s a common conclusion—especially among those who were taught to treat the Bible as one seamless document, where every verse applies equally to every person in every age. But that’s not how the Bible presents itself. And once you learn to rightly divide it, the contradictions vanish.

Let’s start with your first example:

Does Dispensationalism Divide God?

Does Dispensationalism Divide God?

Many critics of dispensational truth argue that it creates a dangerous division within the Godhead—portraying the Father as the source of law and judgment, and the Son as the bearer of grace and mercy. This objection often takes the form of five specific claims:

• That dispensationalism separates the Father and the Son, implying two different divine standards.
• That it introduces two laws—one from the Father, one from the Son—undermining the incarnation.
• That it makes Jesus a new lawgiver who softens or replaces the Father’s commands.
• That it turns the kingdom of God into a political system rather than a spiritual reality.
• That it revives the ancient heresy of Marcionism by dividing the Old and New Testament portrayals of God.

In the article below, we will examine each of these claims in light of Scripture and demonstrate that they arise from a misunderstanding of dispensational teaching. Far from dividing the Godhead, dispensational truth affirms the unity of Father, Son, and Spirit—each operating in perfect harmony across distinct stewardships. Let the Word rightly divided bring clarity.

Dispensationalism and the Unity of the Godhead: One Will, One Purpose

A common accusation against dispensational truth is that it separates the Father and the Son—portraying the Father as the source of law and judgment, and the Son as the agent of grace and mercy. This objection claims that dispensationalism teaches two different divine wills, or even two different standards of righteousness. But this is a misrepresentation. Dispensational truth does not divide the Godhead; it distinguishes the progressive revelation of God’s unified purpose across time. Scripture affirms that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are one in essence, one in purpose, and one in will—yet they have revealed that will in different ways across dispensations.

Let us examine the key misunderstandings and correct them with Scripture.

Dispensational Clarity concerning the Unity of God

Many who oppose dispensational truth often raise concerns about the unity of God and the gospel, suggesting that dispensational teaching divides God's nature, fragments His message, and introduces conflicting standards of salvation. These objections typically centre around five key claims, as listed below—each aiming to discredit the legitimacy of rightly dividing the Word. 

In this post, we will examine these claims carefully and demonstrate, through Scripture alone, that these arguments are unfounded. Far from undermining unity, dispensational truth clarifies God's consistent character, His unfolding gospel, and His sovereign plan across time.

Claims concerning the Unity of God and the Gospel

• Dispensationalism divides Scripture into eras that allegedly change God’s requirements, fracturing the unity of His nature and voice.
• It implies God operates differently in different dispensations, altering His will, law, and gospel — contradicting His immutability (Mal. 3:6; Heb. 13:8).
• It creates multiple gospels (kingdom, grace, everlasting), which undermines the singularity of salvation and violates Galatians 1:8.
• It separates the teachings of Jesus from the Church, making His commands seem irrelevant to believers today.
• It treats the gospel as a system of timelines rather than a revelation of one Person — Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, today, and forever.

Dispensational Clarity concerning the Unity of God

One of the most common objections to dispensational truth is the claim that it divides God, fragments His gospel, and undermines His eternal nature. Critics often assert that dispensationalism teaches multiple ways of salvation, conflicting divine standards, and a fractured view of Christ’s teachings. But these accusations stem from a misunderstanding of what dispensationalism actually affirms. Far from dividing God, dispensational truth rightly distinguishes His dealings with mankind across time, while preserving the unity of His character, His gospel, and His redemptive purpose.

Let us examine and correct five common misconceptions.

The Turning of the Ages: From Kingdom to Grace

The Turning of the Ages: From Kingdom to Grace

The Kingdom Still Offered (Acts 1-7)

The book of Acts opens with the risen Christ speaking to His apostles of the kingdom of God. Their question is simple, almost childlike in its hope: “Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?” (Acts 1:6). The expectation is alive, the promises of the prophets still ringing in their ears. When Peter stands to preach at Pentecost, he does not announce a new programme but calls Israel to repentance so that “the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord, and he shall send Jesus Christ” (Acts 3:19-20). The kingdom is still on offer, the prophetic hope still extended to the nation.

Yet the story takes a darker turn. In Acts 7, Stephen, full of the Holy Ghost, rehearses Israel’s long history of resisting God’s messengers. His words cut deep: “Ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye” (Acts 7:51). The leaders, enraged, drag him outside the city and stone him. This is more than the silencing of a preacher; it is the nation’s climactic rejection of the Messiah and His witness. With Stephen’s death, the prophetic appeal to Israel as a nation reaches its close. The kingdom offer is refused, and the stage is set for God to reveal something entirely new.

The Damascus Road: A New Apostle (Acts 9)

Into this moment of rejection and scattering steps the most unlikely figure. Saul of Tarsus, breathing out threatenings and slaughter, sets out for Damascus to crush the followers of Jesus. But on that road, heaven breaks in. A light shines, a voice speaks, and the persecutor falls to the ground. “Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?” (Acts 9:4). In that instant, the enemy of Christ becomes His chosen vessel.

The Confession Trap: What This Verse Doesn’t Say

The Confession Trap: What 1 John 1:9 Doesn’t Say

1 John 1:9 “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”

The Confusion

Many believers are taught that this verse is a daily requirement for maintaining salvation or staying “in fellowship” with God. Some even fear that unconfessed sin breaks their relationship with Christ or causes them to lose salvation. This leads to a performance-based mindset, where forgiveness is seen as conditional and uncertain.

The Context

1 John was written to address false teachings and to affirm the truth about Jesus Christ. The opening chapter contrasts light and darkness, truth and deception. Verse 9 is part of a broader appeal to unbelievers who claim to have no sin. John is not prescribing a ritual for believers to regain fellowship, but offering a gospel invitation to those who deny their need for forgiveness.

Enduring to the End: What Matthew 24:13 Really Means

“Enduring to the End: What Matthew 24:13 Really Means”

“But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.” Matthew 24:13

The Confusion

This verse is frequently misunderstood and misapplied, especially by those unfamiliar with dispensational distinctions. Many interpret it as teaching that salvation in any age depends on one’s ability to persevere through trials or remain faithful until death. This interpretation can lead to fear, insecurity, and a works-based view of salvation. However, when rightly divided, the verse reveals a very specific meaning tied to Israel’s prophetic program, not the Church’s mystery calling.

The Context

Matthew 24 is part of the Olivet Discourse, where Jesus speaks to His Jewish disciples about events that will unfold during the future Tribulation period. The chapter outlines signs of the end, including deception, persecution, and cosmic disturbances. The audience is clearly Israel, and the context is prophetic, not doctrinal instruction for the Body of Christ. Verse 13, then, must be understood within this framework.

Why It’s Misunderstood

The phrase “endure unto the end” does not refer to mere physical survival through the Tribulation, nor does it imply that salvation is earned by longevity. Rather, it speaks of spiritual endurance — remaining faithful to the Messiah under extreme pressure, even unto death. The “saved” in this context are those who do not abandon their testimony, who refuse to worship the beast, and who remain rooted in their faith despite persecution. This is consistent with Revelation 12:11, which honors those who “loved not their lives unto the death,” and with Jesus’ own words in Luke 9:62, warning that those who look back are not fit for the Kingdom.

The Right Way to Learn Knowledge

The Right Way to Learn Knowledge

In the Christian life, it’s easy to think that once we’ve learned a few truths or understood a few doctrines, we’ve arrived at spiritual maturity. But the Bible warns us against that kind of thinking. True growth is not just about knowing facts—it’s about how we carry that knowledge, how we treat others, and whether our understanding leads to humility or pride. One verse that speaks directly to this is 1 Corinthians 8:2, which says, “And if any man think that he knoweth any thing, he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know.” This is not a harsh statement—it’s a loving correction from the apostle Paul, reminding us that knowledge without love and humility is incomplete.

The context of this verse is a discussion about eating meat that had been offered to idols. In Corinth, some believers knew that idols were nothing and that eating such meat was not sinful. They had the right doctrine, but they were using their liberty without thinking about how it affected weaker believers who didn’t yet understand these things. Paul begins the chapter by saying, “Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth.” In other words, knowledge can make us proud, but love builds others up. Verse 2 follows this thought by showing that if someone thinks he knows something fully, he probably hasn’t yet learned how to handle that knowledge in the way God wants.

The lesson here is simple but important. God is not just interested in what we know—He cares about how we use that knowledge. If our understanding leads us to look down on others, or to act without care for their spiritual wellbeing, then we haven’t yet learned the truth properly. Paul is teaching that true knowledge must be joined with love, patience, and humility. In the dispensation of grace, we are called to walk in truth, but also to walk in charity. That means we must be careful not to let our liberty become a stumbling block for someone else. Even if we are right in doctrine, we can be wrong in attitude.

Why the Bible Seems to Contradict Itself — and How It Doesn’t

Why the Bible Seems to Contradict Itself — and How It Doesn’t

The Bible is a remarkable book. It speaks with authority, it speaks with tenderness, and it speaks across thousands of years of history. Yet, for many, it also seems to speak with contradictions. One page tells us, “Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy” (Exodus 20:8), and another says, “Let no man therefore judge you… in respect of… the sabbath days” (Colossians 2:16). One verse commands, “An eye for an eye” (Exodus 21:24), while another urges, “Whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also” (Matthew 5:39). If we are honest, these differences can leave us puzzled. Has God changed His mind? Is the Bible inconsistent? Or is there something deeper we have not yet understood?

The answer is not that God has changed, nor that His Word is flawed, but that He has spoken to different people at different times under different arrangements. The apostle Paul gives us the key when he writes, “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth” (2 Timothy 2:15). Rightly dividing means recognising the distinctions God Himself has placed in His Word — understanding who is being addressed, when they are being addressed, and under what covenant or dispensation they stand. Without this, we end up blending law with grace, Israel with the Church, prophecy with mystery, and the result is confusion, misapplication, and often a quiet frustration in the Christian life.

Doctrine and Discernment (Part Four): Stewarding Truth and Love in Ministry

Doctrine and Discernment (Part Four): Stewarding Truth and Love in Ministry

There’s a quiet danger in mistaking method for maturity. We often lean on formulas to help us communicate spiritual truths, and rightly so—they offer clarity, structure, and consistency. But the formula is not the substance. It’s a scaffold, not a sanctuary. True spiritual discernment comes not by rigid application, but by yielding to the Spirit’s wisdom. We study, we rightly divide, we prepare—but then we walk.

To help us walk wisely, we’ll explore a five-point framework—people, matter, fruit, motive, and method. This is not a checklist for performance, but a compass for understanding. It’s a way to receive knowledge and begin discerning how to minister God’s Word with balance—avoiding the extremes of Berean rigidity and Romans 14 leniency, and instead walking the Spirit-led middle path of truth and love.

PEOPLE — Who Are You Speaking To?

Not every believer is in the same place spiritually, and the Spirit calls us to discern that difference with care. Some are strong in faith, able to receive correction, digest meatier truths, and engage in doctrinal clarity without stumbling. Others are still growing—needing gentleness, patience, and protection from overload. To minister wisely is to recognise this spectrum and respond accordingly. A hard truth spoken to a soft heart can wound more than it heals. Likewise, withholding clarity from a mature believer can hinder growth. The Spirit leads us to match tone and depth to the hearer’s capacity, not out of compromise, but out of love.