Dispensational Clarity concerning the Unity of God

Many who oppose dispensational truth often raise concerns about the unity of God and the gospel, suggesting that dispensational teaching divides God's nature, fragments His message, and introduces conflicting standards of salvation. These objections typically centre around five key claims, as listed below—each aiming to discredit the legitimacy of rightly dividing the Word. 

In this post, we will examine these claims carefully and demonstrate, through Scripture alone, that these arguments are unfounded. Far from undermining unity, dispensational truth clarifies God's consistent character, His unfolding gospel, and His sovereign plan across time.

Claims concerning the Unity of God and the Gospel

• Dispensationalism divides Scripture into eras that allegedly change God’s requirements, fracturing the unity of His nature and voice.
• It implies God operates differently in different dispensations, altering His will, law, and gospel — contradicting His immutability (Mal. 3:6; Heb. 13:8).
• It creates multiple gospels (kingdom, grace, everlasting), which undermines the singularity of salvation and violates Galatians 1:8.
• It separates the teachings of Jesus from the Church, making His commands seem irrelevant to believers today.
• It treats the gospel as a system of timelines rather than a revelation of one Person — Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, today, and forever.

Dispensational Clarity concerning the Unity of God

One of the most common objections to dispensational truth is the claim that it divides God, fragments His gospel, and undermines His eternal nature. Critics often assert that dispensationalism teaches multiple ways of salvation, conflicting divine standards, and a fractured view of Christ’s teachings. But these accusations stem from a misunderstanding of what dispensationalism actually affirms. Far from dividing God, dispensational truth rightly distinguishes His dealings with mankind across time, while preserving the unity of His character, His gospel, and His redemptive purpose.

Let us examine and correct five common misconceptions.

The Turning of the Ages: From Kingdom to Grace

The Turning of the Ages: From Kingdom to Grace

The Kingdom Still Offered (Acts 1-7)

The book of Acts opens with the risen Christ speaking to His apostles of the kingdom of God. Their question is simple, almost childlike in its hope: “Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?” (Acts 1:6). The expectation is alive, the promises of the prophets still ringing in their ears. When Peter stands to preach at Pentecost, he does not announce a new programme but calls Israel to repentance so that “the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord, and he shall send Jesus Christ” (Acts 3:19-20). The kingdom is still on offer, the prophetic hope still extended to the nation.

Yet the story takes a darker turn. In Acts 7, Stephen, full of the Holy Ghost, rehearses Israel’s long history of resisting God’s messengers. His words cut deep: “Ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye” (Acts 7:51). The leaders, enraged, drag him outside the city and stone him. This is more than the silencing of a preacher; it is the nation’s climactic rejection of the Messiah and His witness. With Stephen’s death, the prophetic appeal to Israel as a nation reaches its close. The kingdom offer is refused, and the stage is set for God to reveal something entirely new.

The Damascus Road: A New Apostle (Acts 9)

Into this moment of rejection and scattering steps the most unlikely figure. Saul of Tarsus, breathing out threatenings and slaughter, sets out for Damascus to crush the followers of Jesus. But on that road, heaven breaks in. A light shines, a voice speaks, and the persecutor falls to the ground. “Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?” (Acts 9:4). In that instant, the enemy of Christ becomes His chosen vessel.

New posts (called 'Shorts') here...

New posts (called 'Shorts') here...

Don't miss out on a few 'shorts' that I have uploaded recently.

Find them here:

• https://thebigpictureviews.blogspot.com/2025/08/the-weaker-brother-isnt-who-you-think.html
• https://thebigpictureviews.blogspot.com/2025/10/many-baptisms.html
• https://thebigpictureviews.blogspot.com/2025/10/we-do-not-walk-by-sight-and-we-do-not.html

The Faith of Christ

The Faith of Christ

Did You Know… the phrase “the faith of Christ” appears in the KJV, but is missing in most modern translations?

It’s found in verses like Galatians 2:16, Philippians 3:9, and Romans 3:22. 

Here’s Galatians 2:16:

“Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ…”

Notice—it doesn’t say “faith in Christ,” but “faith of Christ.” That’s a profound difference.

Modern versions often change it to “faith in Jesus Christ,” which shifts the focus to our belief. But the KJV preserves a deeper truth: we are justified by His faithfulness, not ours. It’s His perfect obedience, His trust in the Father, His finished work that secures our standing.

In this age of grace, salvation is not about our performance or even the strength of our faith—it’s about Christ’s faithfulness, received by grace through faith.

So when you read “the faith of Christ,” let it remind you: your assurance rests not in how tightly you hold on to Him, but in how perfectly He held fast to the Father—for you.

Rightly Dividing or Wrongly Destroying: Exposing the Assault on Paul and the Word of Truth

Rightly Dividing or Wrongly Destroying: Exposing the Assault on Paul and the Word of Truth

False View Warning: A Tainted Doctrine Ahead

The following is a distorted perspective that elevates Jesus’ earthly teachings while rejecting the authority of Paul’s epistles, claiming they contradict Christ. This view misuses Scripture, applies a flawed interpretive lens (“Unity/duality”), and undermines the dispensational distinction between Jesus’ ministry to Israel and Paul’s revelation for the Body of Christ. It’s important to understand what some people believe—so we can rightly divide and correct it.

False View: A Sample of Tainted Doctrine from a comment I received

Some believe that Christians should follow Jesus Himself—not Paul, Peter, or any other apostle. They argue that Catholics follow a Pope who follows Peter, a dead Apostle, and Protestants (many unknowingly) follow Martin Luther, who followed Paul (also a dead Apostle). In contrast, they claim that true Christians should only love Jesus, the Son of God. Using a “Unity/duality” filter, they reinterpret verses by replacing terms like “evil” or “enemy” with “the person's name” to prove deity versus the fallibility of man's teachings and that only Jesus’ words make logical sense. Let me give a few examples:

To understand the “Unity” of Jesus Himself, they suggest putting His name in the "target" of His Own Words. For example:

• Matthew 5:39—"Resist not evil" becomes [Resist not Jesus.]
• Matthew 5:44—"Love thine enemies" becomes [Love your Jesus] / [Love your Christ]

They claim this makes logical sense and reflects true unity.

Then they apply the same “Unity/duality” filter to Paul’s words to expose what they see as contradiction or distortion. For example:

• Ephesians 6:11—"Put on the full armor of God, so that you can make your stand against the devil’s schemes" becomes [Put on the full armor of Paul, so that you can make your stand against Paul’s schemes]

They argue this reveals duality, not unity. The same filter is applied to other apostles, such as James 4:7—“Submit yourselves, then, to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you,” which becomes [Submit yourselves, then, to James. Resist James, and he will flee from you.]

They conclude that only Jesus’ teachings reveal true unity, while apostolic writings reflect duality. Paul is especially criticised, with his teachings referred to as “divine taurum stercore” (Latin for “divine bull dung”). The post urges readers to reject Paul and listen only to Jesus Himself.

Numerous contrasts between Jesus’ teachings and Paul’s writings are listed to support this claim—these will be addressed and corrected later in the article.

Grace, Not Power: Paul’s Apostolic Heart for the Church

Grace, Not Power: Paul’s Apostolic Heart for the Church

Romans 1:11-12 | A Dispensational Teaching Post

“For I long to see you, that I may impart unto you some spiritual gift, to the end ye may be established; That is, that I may be comforted together with you by the mutual faith both of you and me.” —Romans 1:11-12 (KJV)

Paul’s longing to see the Roman believers was both pastoral and doctrinal in nature. Paul had not yet been to Rome. He had not yet met these believers in person. Though his longing included mutual fellowship, his primary desire was to bring the grace doctrine to them—to see them firmly established in the gospel committed to his trust. His desire to visit was driven by love for the saints and a divine urgency to strengthen them through teaching, so they might stand mature and unwavering in Christ.

What Is Paul Really Saying?

• “I long to see you”: This is not casual. It’s a deep yearning, showing Paul’s affection and spiritual concern.
• “That I may impart unto you some spiritual gift”: Paul isn’t claiming to distribute gifts arbitrarily. He’s likely referring to teaching, encouragement, or apostolic insight that would strengthen their walk.
• “To the end ye may be established”: His goal is spiritual establishment—not emotional hype or temporary excitement, but rootedness in truth. Paul wrote his epistle to the Romans around AD 57, sending it ahead to lay the doctrinal foundation of the grace message. Though the believers in Rome could read and begin to grasp the truth from his letter, Paul still longed to see them face to face. His desire was to establish them—not merely inform or stabilize them. When he finally arrived in Rome around AD 60, it was as a prisoner, yet his purpose remained unchanged: to personally establish them, grounding them in the grace doctrine, ensuring they were not only introduced to it, but firmly rooted and built up in it.
  Additional considerations:
• Romans 16:25: Believers are stablished by Paul’s gospel, the preaching of Jesus Christ, and the revelation of the mystery. This is a direct link between spiritual stability and doctrinal teaching.
• Colossians 2:7: We are rooted and built up in him, and stablished in the faith, as ye have been taught. Establishment comes through instruction, not spiritual phenomena.
• 1 Corinthians 13:8–10: Sign gifts like tongues and prophecy were temporary. Once the full revelation came, they ceased. What remains is charity and truth—the enduring foundation for growth.
• Ephesians 4:14-15: Paul warns against being tossed to and fro by false doctrine, and urges believers to grow up into him in all things. This growth comes through truth spoken in love, not through signs or wonders.
• “That is, that I may be comforted together with you”: Paul clarifies—this isn’t one-sided. He expects mutual encouragement through shared faith.
• “By the mutual faith both of you and me”: He’s not above them. He’s beside them. Their faith comforts him just as his comforts them. The phrase “mutual faith” reminds us that faith isn’t private—it’s communal. We draw strength from each other’s trust in Christ.

This is a model of spiritual fellowship: not hierarchical, but reciprocal.

What Is “Imparting a Spiritual Gift”?